|
Dear members of the GTAP community,
The Journal of Global Economic Analysis (JGEA) has published many foundational tools for applied general equilibrium (AGE) analysis. This email provides a (partial) list of JGEA publications describing these tools and suggested text to cite them. A goal of the Journal is to increase the credibility of AGE analyses by providing a flagship publication for the AGE community. In the regard, the JGEA is currently ranked the 75th best economics periodical (out of 2,227) according to Simple Impact Factors produced by RePEc (in the same neighborhood as Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Games and Economic Behavior, and Journal of Economic Geography).
Please help us increase the profile of AGE modelling in the broader research community by citing relevant JGEA articles in your research. Suggested text for citing research built on the GTAP Data Base and associated tools is provided below. Please feel free to use and adapt this text in your work. The suggested citation text will be updated dynamically at https://jgea.org/resources/jgea/ojs/index.php/jgea/about/editorialPolicies#custom-1.
Best wishes,
Niven Winchester Co-Editor, Journal of Global Economic Analysis
Suggested citations for research built on the GTAP Data Base and associated tools
Studies using the ‘standard’ GTAP Data Base Version 10 of the GTAP Data Base is described by Aguiar et al. (2019) and further details on construction of the database are provided by Aguiar et al. (2016). The database can be used with a ‘standard’ model programmed using either GEMPACK (Corong et al., 2018) or GAMS (van der Mensbrugghe, 2018) software. In other extensions of the GTAP Data Base, Lanz and Rutherford (2016) provide a suite of data tools and template models, and Britz and van der Mensbrugghe (2018) provide a framework that nests several well-known models using a flexible, modular framework. See van Tongeren et al. (2017) summarize the history of the GTAP Data Base and associated modeling efforts.
Trade-focused studies Version 10 of the GTAP Data Base is described by Aguiar et al. (2019) and further details on construction of the database are provided by Aguiar et al. (2016). The database is commonly used with the standard GTAP model (Corong et al., 2018; van der Mensbrugghe, 2018). International trade in the standard model exploits the ‘Armington’ approach, but several authors have developed implementations building on ‘new’ trade theory, such as the Melitz model (Akgul et al. 2016; Bekkers, 2018; Dixon et al., 2016 & 2019). See van Tongeren et al. (2017) for a history of the GTAP Data Base and related modeling efforts.
Energy and environment-focused studies using the GTAP-Power Data Base Peters (2016a) develops the GTAP-Power Data Base, which extends the ‘standard’ GTAP Data Base (Aguiar et al., 2016 & Aguiar et al., 2019) by disaggregating the electricity sector into 11 electricity generation technologies and transmission and distribution. The ‘standard’ GTAP model (Corong et al., 2018; van der Mensbrugghe, 2018) represents only a single electricity sector, but Peters (2016b) provides an economy-wide model with electricity detail that is suitable for use with the GTAP-Power database. The GTAP-Power Data Base has been extended to include fossil fuel consumption subsidies by Chepelievet al. (2018). See van Tongeren et al. (2017) for a history of the GTAP Data Base and related modeling efforts.
References Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E., McDougall, R., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2019). The GTAP Data Base: Version 10. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4(1), 1-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.040101AF
Akgul, Z., Villoria, N., & Hertel, T. (2016). GTAP-HET: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity into the GTAP Model. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 111-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.010102AF
Bekkers, E., & Francois, J. (2018). A Parsimonious Approach to Incorporate Firm Heterogeneity in CGE-Models.Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 3(2), 1-68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.030201AF
Britz, W., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2018). CGEBox: A Flexible, Modular and Extendable Framework for CGE Analysis in GAMS. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 3(2), 106-177. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.030203AF Top of Form Chepeliev, M., McDougall, R., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2018). Including Fossil-fuel Consumption Subsidies in the GTAP Data Base. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 3(1), 84-121. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.030102AF
Corong, E., Hertel, T., McDougall, R., Tsigas, M., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2017). The Standard GTAP Model, Version 7. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 2(1), 1-119. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.020101AF
Dixon, P., Jerie, M., & Rimmer, M. (2016). Modern Trade Theory for CGE Modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 1-110. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.010101AF
Dixon, P., Jerie, M., & Rimmer, M. (2019). Melitz in GTAP Made Easy: the A2M Conversion Method and Result Interpretation. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4(1), 97-127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.040104AF
Peters, J. (2016a). The GTAP-Power Data Base: Disaggregating the Electricity Sector in the GTAP Data Base. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 209-250. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.010104AF
van Tongeren, F., Koopman, R., Karingi, S., Reilly, J., & Francois, J. (2017). Back to the Future: A 25-year Retrospective on GTAP and the Shaping of a New Agenda. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 2(2), 1-42. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.020201AF
|
发表于 2019-11-26 15:17:28
收藏